Search options (Page 7 of 33)

If someone have the skill and time to write a software to update the .elmt file version. It will be great, especially for qet 2.0.

Ok I also got the problem,
element is ok on diagram editor but not in element editor.

Hello Re-searcher,
Strange what you say, I do test :
Create one element by version 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 (4 elements) and I open each elements with each versions and except when I try to open element created with version 0.7 or higher in qet 0.6 (which in normal because dynamic text was created in version 0.7) everything work well, and I don't see difference in the font attribute on the xml file.
Have you got an exemple please.

Fixed

No of course we don’t want to exclude anonyone .
It’s true it’s very more easy for us to speak french.

About the thumbnail scale, I think we can create a new thread in english and this thread will be the continuity of this one : https://qelectrotech.org/forum/viewtopi … 247#p14247
Why a new thread ? Because the first post will be a resume of all ideas submitted in this thread and everyone can see the evolution in the first post instead of read all the thread.

About size I think 1px = 1mm is enough the goal of Qet is not to draw in very realistic way an electrical cabinet, but it's true that font become too small with this scale.
One thing is sure, the scale must be a multiple of 1 (1:1, 1:2) but not something like 1:2.2
At the end, no matter what scale we choose, for me it's the same to code.

Some things I can quickly add (when a scale will chosen) is a little ruler tool in the element editor, to help the drawing.
One other thing is to create a new category in the element collection for the new elements with the good size, then we are sure all element inside have the same scale.

Not sure to understand well the  "I hope: no!" . You want or not want "rough" rectangles for large cabinet ?
My opinion, we can have both and I already though about that.
We need to add new information about the element (width, height, depth), then with these information Qet can automatically add lambda rectangle for every device, and user only need to arrange the disposition of these rectangle.
But this feature need lot of work, and first, it's not the actual priority feature, second this feature need some deep change and will probably be a better place in Qet 2.0 (in 2100 ) https://qelectrotech.org/wiki_new/refon … lectrotech sorry it's in french but this wiki page is more a memory help /todo list for me than a road map .

The journey of Qet is very clear, be an industrial electrical designing software, like eplan or see electrical for the most well know, of course Qet will never be as complete as these software,  I haven't got the skills and the time for that.

Je pense partir sur 1px = 1mm, ça permet de faire des dessins assez précis (en tout cas suffisamment pour des mises en armoire).
Beaucoup d'élément actuel ne sont pas à la bonne cote mais de toute façon peut importe l’échelle choisis il y aurait forcément eu des éléments à reprendre.

Pour les dimensions (ta capture d’écran) c’est à titre informatif il ne faut pas se baser dessus (pour diverse raison).
Au sujet des bornes et du texte c’est obligé d’être pris en compte pour des raisons techniques, par contre il faut bien faire la différence entre les deux type de texte : les textes éditables ne sont pas pris en compte, seuls les textes fixe le sont.

Dans les spinbox (les boutons permettant de régler les dimensions des parties graphiques) il n’y a aucune indication d’unité (ce sont des pixels en fait) je vais mettre ‘mm’ après la valeur, ce sera clair comme ça.

Je pense mettre en place rapidement un petit outil de cotation dans l’éditeur d’élément, MAIS ATTENTION se sera juste un outil d’aide pour la création d’élément, celui-ci n’apparaîtra pas sur l’éditeur de schéma et ne sera pas non plus sauvegardé, c’est-à-dire qu’une fois l’éditeur fermé si vous rouvrez à nouveau le même élément tous les outils de cotation auront disparu.

Faut-il créer une nouvelle section dans la collection d’élément avec les vignettes de mise en armoire à la bonne cote (à coter de celle existante), afin d’avoir une section dans lequel on est sûre que tous les éléments sont à la même échelle, l’ancienne section pourra être purgée au fur et à mesure ?
Moi je vote oui.

About this commit :
Only the editable texts of elements are changed.
To test it, open the project who have font size problem on the good screen, save it in an other name, re-open the new file and test it.
If everything work well we can add these changes to other texts of qet.

Hello ruggedvid.
I try with my win10 work laptop and I've got the bug.
At this time I haven't got any solution, but I probably have enough stuff to find it.
I will work on it and twist my fingers for a solution that work with existing files and not only with news.

Yes one of my colleague report me this issue.
I think they come from this commit :  https://git.tuxfamily.org/qet/qet.git/c … f509e23332

I will take a look this week.

By default qet use sans serif font.
If you change font make sure, the font is also present in other computer.

But I don't think your problem come from font family.

It's very hard without 4k screen to test it.
Can you send us your project, and also the last log of qet (you can found the log in the about qet dialog).
The wrong scale appear on all element text, editable and not editable text or only on editable text ?

This feature (comment in a frame snapped below the Xref) was removed since a while.
Instead you need to add an element text, and set it to display comment.

See https://download.qelectrotech.org/qet/m … texts.html

Hello Mike,
Actually the terminal manager is in development and should not be used for real project, prefer use unalcalde's QET TB Generator witch work very well.
Of course you can test the terminal manager and report bugs, ideas/something you want to have for this functionality, in this topic  https://qelectrotech.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=1957 the topic is in french but you can write a post in English.

PS : I take a look at your website, I'm very impressed a company like your (High precision valve test) use our modest software.
I'm always (probably Laurent and all contribs of QET) very interested and content to see real use case of QET.