- Energie/Solaire-thermique/signalétique
- Nomenclatures/Base/Renvois
Renvois supprimés
- Références/Références pas link. -> a voir
- Références/Références avec link/Références /next/previous -> j'ai bien peur qu'on s'y perdre..
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
QElectroTech → Posts by scorpio810
- Energie/Solaire-thermique/signalétique
- Nomenclatures/Base/Renvois
Renvois supprimés
- Références/Références pas link. -> a voir
- Références/Références avec link/Références /next/previous -> j'ai bien peur qu'on s'y perdre..
(btw i am getting familiair with NPP editor, in eq_nl busy on line 1000 of 7443)
Thanks.
Bonjour et bienvenue Bernard_andre,
Oui, je suis tout a fait d'accord avec toi, d'ailleurs ces symboles manquent à la collection, si ça te dit de les partager je les ajouterai.
Pareil pour le Cartouche DIN6771_A4_DE.
Intéressant ton site
Laurent
But.... it's not all ! There is a small problem with =/+ :
we also need them in the cross references.
For example : you have a project with 2 pages.
first page : =I1+L1 / 1
second page : =I2+L2 / 1
The page number is for both pages "1".
It means : the cross references have to show "=I1+L1/1" and not only "1".
No luck, latest German plan ( create in 2014 by German maker) i open this night at my work, with same =plan and + inst1 in all diagrams, the cross references for contacts have show folio number ... :p
I think, We have left the choice to user.
I have some customers who doesn't like the leveling with =/+, so the project tree (in Eplan) look like as it now is in qet.
good song ...
But.... it's not all ! There is a small problem with =/+ :
we also need them in the cross references.
For example : you have a project with 2 pages.
first page : =I1+L1 / 1
second page : =I2+L2 / 1
The page number is for both pages "1".
It means : the cross references have to show "=I1+L1/1" and not only "1".
Ok, i think isn't a big problem.
I understand list of titleblock is cut in many sublevels.
At time isn't possibility to adding a sublevel in project.
You want sublevels by tags "=" and "+", i think is just a visual option.
Yes, element property widget can add informations: "installation and implantation " and wrote these in diagram like comments.
Is planned in future.
Nice widget ;-)
Nuri
Yes this norm isn't really used in France, but i can see in German, Austrian machines at my work.
Thanks for capture it explain well these functions.
Fixed, thanks.
Good remark, thx.
Pas dans synaptic, soit dans l' historique Web Svn[1] soit sur la ML.
Edit: le changelog d'un paquet Debian est fait pour indiquer les changements sur le paquet et non les modifications Upstream.
Qu'est-ce que le "commit" ?
Cordialement.
Alexis
L'envoi d'un patch sur le subversion.
ça peux être un ajout de symboles, l'ajout de traduction, du code etc..
Voila.
Le titre du commit n'est pas explicite pour toi?
I saw the same problem while moving a rectangle or circle, i'm trying to reproduce the problem and solve it..
Marcelo
I think this problem is just for Ms Windows platform and under XP ?
Hi Czs,
Thanks for compliments.
Yes, Debian version in repository is up to date than Windows version, and for Fedora Remi Collet build frequently latest SVN revision, in Gentoo ebuild 999 can compiling latest code.
For Windows platform i build just when a new feature pull in, or when i have time ... :p
Look Subversion history (branch/trunk), all commits does not require a new windows package, only Debian package for translators.
http://svnweb.tuxfamily.org/log.php?rep … dir=1&
At this time is not possibilty to reattach a connexion.
Mmiacca
Branch devel created.
You can yourself merge your code to trunk
But is very buggy i can revert your commit :p
thx
Laurent
Mmiacca
If you want i can create a new branch for you.
I just delete not used branch devel and 0.4.
Mmiacca
Your username is added to ML and SVN, thanks.
For Qt creator: http://qelectrotech.org/wiki/doc/qt_creator
svn+ssh://mmiacca@svn.tuxfamily.org/svnroot/qet/qet/trunk
Mmiacca,
I use minGW too for make windows build under my VM seven.
cd /d %working_directory%\qelectrotech_trunk
//on lance la compilation
qmake
mingw32-make -j9 -f Makefile.Release
http://qelectrotech.org/forum/viewtopic … 1830#p1830
http://qelectrotech.org/wiki/doc/dev_windows
Porting Qet code to Qt 5 is a good feature for future.
Will be a pleasure to have a developer account, ¿are there any rules to commit? ¿any simple bugs or simple features to do?
Marcelo
One, you do to subscribe to tuxfamily: by example just ask : I want to join QElectroTech project, after tell me in IRC channel, or send me an email, i just need your loguin (username subscription) for create your account to Qet subversion and mailing list.
You can work on what you want.
What your operating system?
If you use gnu/linux is very easy, Windows much less.
Ms Windows: cygwin, minGW, etc.
You use qt creator as IDE?
For compiling.
http://qelectrotech.org/wiki/es/doc/test_dev_version
Translation in Spanish is make by Alfredo in Mexico.
http://qelectrotech.org/wiki/es/doc/subversion
Laurent
Hi and welcome Marcelo,
We just use trunk at this time.
For example:
svn export svn://svn.tuxfamily.org/svnroot/qet/qet/trunk qelectrotech_trunk
I see you join IRC #qet channel, just ask ;-)
I can open up a developer account on Qet subversion for you, if you want.
Hi and welcome Marcelo,
Is there a big difference between Portuguese and brazilian ?
Btw, for example you can see Portuguese translation make by Jose Carlos in attached file.
Just open with Qt linguist (for see attached source code in Qt linguist you do download latest subversion revision in repository).
http://qelectrotech.org/wiki/en/doc/translation
If you want to contribute, a good way is know a little subversion, and subscribe to Tuxfamily to join QElectroTech project, after i can add your account to Qet subversion.
(this is to work in standalone mode)
Alors en faite un symbole est universel sans barrière de langue, mais à mon avis il serait plus simple de faire une table 2 colonnes:
- colonne de gauche le type en texte : NO, NC, NO-Tr, NO-Tt, Puissance, INV, ... qui correspond à la balise "type" du symbole
- colonne de droite la position
Comme cela le système est presque sans limite, alors que les symboles sont limitants.
Surement pas!
Mais plutôt dans ce style
Mais en France c'est plutôt la croix qu'on retrouve le plus souvent dans nos schémas.
QElectroTech → Posts by scorpio810
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Generated in 0.089 seconds (18% PHP - 82% DB) with 5 queries