Topic: potenzials

Hello
I've been working with some versions QTech but with all the problem with cross-references. If I call the current-carrying conductor with eg L1, L2, L3, and this is with fuses Connect everything OK
but if I label manager with N and PE, and this will connect with, for example, terminals shown me again and again, the PE or N several times exist no matter how I this confirms all previously designated Leiter renamed PE or vice versa as if a connection would be between the potentials.

Sincerely yours

Stebo

Re: potenzials

Hello,
Wat Qet version you use?

Re: potenzials

Hello
I work with the versions 20.02.2015 Version 0.4
and to test 0.5-dev + 3929-1

Re: potenzials

Could you send me a example or your project to see this problem?

Re: potenzials

Hello
How can I upload the project have no idea

Re: potenzials

Hello,
You could click on cite link.

http://download.tuxfamily.org/qet/forum_img/cite_link.png

7 (edited by Calypso 2015-05-03 20:22:22)

Re: potenzials

Hello
I hope found the way

Post's attachments

Attachment icon Test.qet 128.34 kb, 327 downloads since 2015-05-03 

Re: potenzials

Hello,
I see a little mistake in your project.nomicons/tongue
http://download.tuxfamily.org/qet/forum_img/caplyso.png
http://download.tuxfamily.org/qet/forum_img/caplyso1.png

9 (edited by Calypso 2015-05-03 21:50:34)

Re: potenzials

Hello

I have two pictures of the drawing looks like here with me. There is no connection between N / PE when I insert a new connection between cross-reference 1-G13 and the terminal X100 / PE appears the selection. Opt N / FI100 specify the potentials in PE N / FI100 be changed and if I will select them PE also changed the N potential in PE

Post's attachments

Picture 1.JPG, 377.4 kb, 812 x 675
Picture 1.JPG 377.4 kb, 441 downloads since 2015-05-03 

Re: potenzials

Strange, but you are right.
Delete all connections  N and PE in all X100 and redraw also it run better after.
http://download.tuxfamily.org/qet/forum_img/caplyso2.png

11 (edited by Calypso 2015-05-05 19:21:53)

Re: potenzials

Hello

Thanks for your help.

 

Sincerely yours

 

SteBo

Re: potenzials

Hello

I have the error found it was the terminal

but I do not know why. I have the terminal new created

  
 

Sincerely yours

 

SteBo

Re: potenzials

Hello,
Thank you for the feedback.

14 (edited by Calypso 2015-06-03 22:30:43)

Re: potenzials

Hello
After several try with terminals I've found the problem has to do with what is selected when the component editor as basic type. Is simply selected as the base type will not make any mistakes. Is selected as the basic type terminal strip conductors names get mixed up. Is it important for a function, which is selected as a terminal base type

Sincerely yours
 
SteBo