Topic: Wire Number Association
Hi all
I have used Electrotech for many years and extremely grateful for such a great program. To my surprise I was editing a drawing in version 0.9 and came across something I have never seen before - probably a clash from earlier versions maybe?
QElectroTech V 0.90+c7891bc4cb0a58100c957a06d79751d3
Compilation : GCC 11.3.0
Built with Qt 5.15.7 - x86_64 - Date : Jan 6 2023 : 12:55:49
Run with Qt 5.15.7 using 2 thread(s)
CPU : NAME INTEL(R) XEON(R) PLATINUM 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHZ
RAM Total : 4 GB
RAM Available : 0 GB
GPU : VideoProcessor Teradici PCoIP WDDM Display Adapter
GPU RAM : RAM Total : AdapterRAM 0 B
OS : winnt - x86_64 - Version : Windows Server 2016 Version 1809 - Kernel : 10.0.17763
*** Qt screens ***
( 1 : 1920 x 1031 )
I have existing elements I have created in the element editor (in previous versions) that have numerous terminals. To my surprise I was updating a drawing when I was prompted to assign wire number x to 55 conductors? It is an independent circuit however QET is seeing the terminals as all connected.
I was curious whether this was across the board but it doesn't happen with standard QET symbols or other symbols I have created. Maybe it's due to the larger number of terminals in the element?
Either way this particular element sees all the terminals as being the same connection/potential and will attempt to assign the same wire numbers to all. If I change a wire number in my existing drawing (originally all different) it will update the others to match.
Have I missed something and doing something wrong for 0.9?
I have attached a screenshot of some random elements connected to different terminals to show how they all take on wire #1 automatically as soon as they are connected.
Thanks in advance.
Screenshot 2023-08-04 165926.png 39.81 kb, 89 downloads since 2023-08-04
Not sure when or why that happened. Set to simple type and all is well. I haven't used the terminal type before so it was the first time I'd seen this behaviour. Good learning experience. 