<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[QElectroTech — Suggestion: Save auto numbering as program preferences]]></title>
		<link>https://qelectrotech.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=2719</link>
		<atom:link href="https://qelectrotech.org/forum/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2719&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Suggestion: Save auto numbering as program preferences.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 16:17:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Suggestion: Save auto numbering as program preferences]]></title>
			<link>https://qelectrotech.org/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=20395#p20395</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p> </p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>First of all, I find it annoying, to define a set of auto numbering schemes for each project I begin.&nbsp; It would be more efficient, if you could save those rules as part of your program preferences.</p></blockquote></div><p>I was wondering similarly recently. I just discovered a great copy-paste solution in the following thread by Laurent.<br /><a href="https://qelectrotech.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=2571">https://qelectrotech.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=2571</a></p><p>Basically, you open an existing project in a text editor and copy any settings you need from between the &lt;newdiagrams&gt;...&lt;/newdiagrams&gt; tags and paste to a new file saved with .qet extension. Now continue in QET <img src="https://qelectrotech.org/forum/img/smilies/nomicons/smile.png" width="20" alt="nomicons/smile" /> </p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (hairy_kiwi)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 16:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://qelectrotech.org/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=20395#p20395</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Suggestion: Save auto numbering as program preferences]]></title>
			<link>https://qelectrotech.org/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=19721#p19721</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p> Hello everyone, hope you are doing well.</p><p>I was using QET very much these last holidays and created a lots of drawings.</p><p>I fiddled a lot with the auto numbering capabilities of QET.</p><p>First of all, I find it annoying, to define a set of auto numbering schemes for each project I begin.&nbsp; It would be more efficient, if you could save those rules as part of your program preferences.</p><p>Is there any chance, to save them in the program preferences, e.g. a personal config file?</p><p>Next, I defined ca. 15 rules for elements only.&nbsp; I tried to define a kind of hierarchical rule names or at least alphabetical or numerical names.&nbsp; None of that worked out.&nbsp; When inserting a new element and I use the drop down menu in the &quot;Auto numbering selection&quot; panel, they are presented in random order, which makes it hard, to find the desired rule fast.&nbsp; This is prone to errors. :-(</p><p>Than I do have a feature request in mind, but I am not sure, if this due to my crooked mind.&nbsp; I am an mechanical engineer, not a trained electrician.&nbsp; &nbsp;So please bear with me.</p><p>I think I have noticed, that the labeling for e.g. fuses are as follows (at least in Germany).&nbsp; In a cabinet, there are often more than one level stocked on each other.&nbsp; The fuses in the lowest level are labeled 1F1, 1F2, 1F3, ... whilst the fuses in the next level are labeled 2F1, 2F2, and so on.</p><p>I was not able, to insert a variable for the level indicator.</p><p>Imagine, that when you select a fuse related numbering scheme, an additional box would get activated.&nbsp; It presents the level-number, you most recently selected, plus offers the +/- switches, to increase or decrease the number.&nbsp; Depending in that prefix number, the counter is reset accordingly.&nbsp; Wouldn&#039;t that be nice?</p><p>One more thing, that I was not able to get fixed by myself.&nbsp; </p><p>I draw my schemes to present the logic of any circuit.&nbsp; Therefore, a plan of a cabinet often shows switches, motors and other elements, that are not build into that specific cabinet.&nbsp; This kind of drawing style makes the path of the current/conductor complete, so you get the logic behind it.</p><p>In case, an external component is presented in such scheme, I want the label to contain the plant and/or location of that element to be shown, to make clear, that this belongs not to that cabinet in question.&nbsp; I tried to use a rule like </p><div class="codebox"><pre><code>=%{LM}+%{M}-M%{sequ_1}</code></pre></div><p> and hoped, that I was able, to override the plant and location for that element, when editing its properties.&nbsp; (The Selection Properties PopUp offers inputs for plant and location as well.)&nbsp; But this specific information is not observed.&nbsp; Instead the global values entered in the project properties are used. :-(</p><p>Is there any chance, to change this?</p><p>Have a fine day </p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (titanic-jb)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 09:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://qelectrotech.org/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=19721#p19721</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
